Toulmin's Argument

 According to the chapter titled “Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Method” in the textbook titled Communicating Online by Julia Green, the Toulmin method is a method of analyzing arguments by identifying the claim, their ground for such a claim, and the warrants that connect the two. The second level to this model is identifying any qualifiers to the claim that would limit its application, the quality of any evidence presented, and the rebuttals they address as well as how well these rebuttals are addressed (Green, 2017, p. 324). Every argument has a strong claim that is based on some aspect of their lived or researched experience. The warrant is the bridge between these two that explains how they are related. The qualifiers are limiting statements such as “in most cases” that limit the applicability and are used as a way to reduce the ability for rebuttals. The evidence used has to be from a reputable source and relevant in order to make a good argument. 


Below is an example of the Toulmin method being applied online. 

 


This website is a hub for research journals. This particular article uses the Toulin method to take apart students’ discussions online. This article found that using this analysis structure showed where the students in the introductory philosophy course both excelled and lacked in their argumentation skills. This skill is vital for their particular course, and so using this method is a great way for them to strengthen their argumentative skills. That is not limited to just these particular students though. Everyone who creates an argument on any side of any topic can use this to find where they are lacking. 


Green, J. M. (2017). Communicating online. McGraw Hill Education Create. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital Native or Digital Immigrant?

Engaging in Online Meetings

Online Communication's Role in My Relationship